Alvaro Diego PeñaI; Eduardo Alberto CadavidI; Mayra EstacioII; Alejandro Moreno-AngaritaI; Hector G Olaya RIV; Stephany OlayaIII
DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0252
CT = Computed tomography
TTE = Transthoracic echocardiogram
INTRODUCTION
Aortic dissection is a rare but fatal complication following orthotopic heart transplantation. According to the underlying pathophysiology and the time of onset, patients can be categorized into four groups: the first category includes acute aortic rupture occurring in the early postoperative phase resulting from a mismatch between the donor and the recipient aorta; the second group comprises patients with postoperative infections resulting in mediastinitis and mycotic or bacterial pseudoaneurysms of the ascending aorta; the third group consists of patients with true aneurysms and dissection of the native aorta associated with a traditional cardiovascular risk factor; and aortic dissection in patients with heterotopic heart transplant makes up the final group[1].
The diagnosis may be difficult because, in many cases, dissection may mimic various pathological states and could present without pain. It should be considered when dilatation of the ascending aorta or aortic arch and aortic valve regurgitation are present.
The appropriate surgical approach for patients with heart transplants and aortic dissection remains unknown. In this report, we describe the case of a type A aortic dissection in the native aorta that occurred 21 years after orthotopic heart transplantation and the surgical technique successfully applied for its repair.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 52-year-old man with a pertinent history of antiphospholipid syndrome, deep venous thrombosis, and major depressive disorder underwent heart transplantation for end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy in 2000. The patient was successfully discharged after heart transplantation.
In April 2021, during his routine examination, transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed a normal aortic valve and sinotubular junction with a large saccular ascending aortic aneurysm close to the aortic arch. Doppler color image acquisition suggested type A aortic dissection. Right and left ventricular functions were preserved (Figure 1).
Computed tomography (CT) angiography of the chest confirmed the presence of a saccular ascending aortic aneurysm of 101 × 91 × 92 mm, associated with a dissection flap measuring 33 × 30 mm, originating above the sinotubular junction, involving the ascending aortic aneurysm, and extending to the iliac arteries. Both coronary arteries were well seen in a heart CT, showing the absence of obstructive disease or dissection (Figure 2).
Surgical Treatment
The patient was taken to urgent surgery, and the operation was planned based on a TTE and CT angiogram of the aorta and heart. We first defined the location and length of the aortic dissection and aneurysm. From the images, we can see that the proximal part of the aorta, such as the aortic valve, coronary arteries, aortic root, and sinotubular junction corresponding to the donor side, was free from dissection and aneurysm. However, above it, there was a large aneurysm that involved the ascending aorta before the brachiocephalic trunk origin, and it was associated with a dissection flap that involved the aortic arch and descending aorta (Figure 3).
Peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass was instituted after percutaneous ultrasound-guided cannulation of the right femoral vein and artery. Transesophageal echocardiography was used to guide cannulation. In the arterial line, the guidewire was located in the true lumen, and in the vein line, the tip of the venous cannula was located 2 cm above the inferior vena cava. A medial sternotomy was performed intraoperatively, and many adhesions were observed in the ascending aorta that involved the pleura and lung parenchyma, corresponding to previously used hemostatic sealants. This made it difficult to release the aorta, so we decided not to separate the aorta’s back wall from it. The aorta was cross-clamped, the ascending aortic aneurysm was opened, and Custodiol® cardioplegia was given at 20 ml/kg by direct cannulation of the right and left coronary ostia.
A large aneurysmal dilatation of the ascending aorta was then removed, and inspection of the aortic root showed normal morphology of the donor aortic valve, sinotubular junction, and coronary artery ostium (Figure 4). The aorta suture plane of the receptor-donor anastomosis was located within the aortic dissection. The ascending aorta was reconstructed with a 30 mm Dacron® Gelweave® synthetic graft. For the proximal donor-side anastomosis, we used a 3-0 polypropylene suture, placing deep stitches between the donor aortic wall (traveling 5 mm to 20 mm in depth in the posterior wall) and the Dacron® graft.
Once moderate hypothermia at 25 °C was reached, circulatory arrest and antegrade cerebral perfusion by direct cannulation of both right and common carotid arteries were given, and hemiarch or distal recipient side anastomosis was constructed. First, aortic wall layers were stuck back together by using separate stitches of pledged 3-0 polypropylene covering the circumference, and then native aorta Dacron® graft anastomosis was performed utilizing felp reinforced 3-0 polypropylene running suture. Circulatory arrest lasted 36 minutes.
Intraoperative echocardiographic verification showed good biventricular function and flow through the true aortic lumen. The aortic cross-clamping time was 55 minutes, and the cardiopulmonary bypass time was 108 minutes. Figure 4 showed postoperative imaging before sternal closure.
The operation was completed without complications. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit and discharged 14 days after surgery. Postoperative therapy was without complications.
One year postoperatively, the patient remains in functional class I. A follow-up TTE showed trivial aortic insufficiency and normal biventricular function.
DISCUSSION
Ascending aortic dissection is uncommon in heart transplant recipients. Its frequency after orthotopic heart transplantation varies between 1 and 2%, in a few cases reported in the literature[1]. This problem usually affects the native aorta, in patients with risk factors that are similar to those in the general population, like hypertension, Marfan syndrome, pre-existing aortic aneurysms, and atherosclerosis[2,3].
Cardiac surgery other than retransplantation after heart transplantation is a challenge, and emergency procedures have high in-hospital mortality[4]. The first case of successful surgical treatment of aortic dissection confined to the donor aorta in a recipient of an orthotopic cardiac allograft was reported by Pak et al.[2] in 1995. The appropriate management of transplant patients with Stanford type A dissection remains unknown. Most patients with acute aortic dissection are managed using open surgical techniques with a limited role for endovascular repair depending upon the extent of the dissection field[5].
The strict graft inclusion technique for aortic root replacement represents a safe and feasible technique that avoids major complications like bleeding from injury to the coronary ostium, left atrial roof, and right pulmonary vein. In this case, we avoid any of those complications by limiting the surgical plane of dissection in the posterior aortic wall.
In our patient, we used hemiarch and ascending aorta replacement with the inclusion technique. With this method, the correction in the diameter of the ascending aorta corrects severe aortic insufficiency without touching the aortic valve since the main mechanism for this insufficiency is dilatation of the sinotubular junction and ascending aorta. The time for extracorporeal circulation was 108 minutes. Ali et al.[6] reported an aortic cross-clamping time of 156 minutes with an extracorporeal circulation time of 222 minutes without the need for circulatory arrest. In published case reports, different surgical techniques have been described. In order to minimize the risk of infection resulting from immunosuppression, especially in the early period after transplantation, Teebken et al.[7] performed an aortic replacement with human tissue to prevent the implantation of foreign material and optimize postoperative hemodynamics; however, they described a prolonged cross-clamping time.
In our institution, it is routine to close the pericardium in these patients, first to reduce the space left by the dilated native heart and thus reduce the accumulation of pericardial fluid and reduce the probability of inadvertent injury to the right ventricle and great vessels in a redo heart surgery; and second, to reduce adherence syndrome, which may even involve lung tissue in the great vessels and right atrium.
Another challenge of this entity is to recognize aortic dissection in transplant patients because it is often underdiagnosed. Dissection may mimic various pathological states, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and tamponade. As the heart is denervated, myocardial or aortic injury can also occur without pain, and mediastinal scarring may prevent or even delay aortic rupture[1]. As an option for timely screening and diagnosis, to perform CT of the heart annually in transplant patients could be chosen, which would allow not only the evaluation of coronary disease but also other complications such as aneurysms and aortic dissection. Fukuhara et al.[8] have proposed annual follow-up of this diagnostic technique in patients with risk factors such as dilatation of the native aorta at the time of transplantation and refractory hypertension.
CONCLUSION
We reported a successful strict graft inclusion technique for aortic root replacement to treat aortic dissection in a patient with history of heart transplantation 21 years before. It represents a safe and feasible method in patients in whom the aorta is firmly attached to the surrounding tissues and their separation could lead to irreparable vascular and large vessel injuries.
REFERENCES
1. Schellemans C, Tack W, Vanderheyden M. Acute type A aortic dissection in a cardiac allograft recipient: case report and review of the literature. Heart. 2004;90(11):1256-8. doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.024307. [MedLine]
2. Lopez CE, Lopez MJ, de Diego J, Cortina JM. Early acute aortic dissection of the donor aorta after orthotopic heart transplantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(4):715-6. doi:10.1510/icvts.2009.210724. [MedLine]
3. Pak PH, Gillinov AM, Hruban RH, Rosenthal LS, Rosengard BR, Augustine SM, et al. Aortic dissection in a cardiac allograft recipient: a case report. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1995;14(5):1003-5. [MedLine]
4. Goekler J, Zuckermann A, Osorio E, Brkic FF, Uyanik-Uenal K, Laufer G, et al. Cardiac surgery after heart transplantation: elective operation or last exit strategy? Transplant Direct. 2017;3(10):e209. doi:10.1097/TXD.0000000000000725.
5. Stephens EH, Fukuhara S, Neely RC, Takayama H. Aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortopathy following heart transplantation. J Card Surg. 2017;32(10):667-9. doi:10.1111/jocs.13215. [MedLine]
6. Hage A, Hage F, Toeg H, Davies R, Boodhwani M. Aortic dissection following heart transplantation. J Card Surg. 2017;32(2):156-8. doi:10.1111/jocs.13096. [MedLine]
7. Teebken OE, Pethig K, Krieg P, Haverich A, Harringer W. Valve-sparing repair after aortic root dissection following heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18(8):807-9. doi:10.1016/s1053-2498(98)00069-2. [MedLine]
8. Fukuhara S, Stephens EH, Glotzbach JP, Borger MA. Repair of ascending aortic aneurysms following cardiac transplantation. J Card Surg. 2016;31(12):778-80. doi:10.1111/jocs.12865. [MedLine]
Authors’Roles & Responsibilities
ADP = Substantial contributions to the conception of the work; revising the work; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published
EAC = Substantial contributions to the conception of the work; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published
ME = Drafting the work and revising it; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published
AMA = Substantial contributions to the design of the work; Drafting the work; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published
HGOR = Substantial contributions to the design of the work; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published
SO = Substantial contributions to the design of the work; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published
Article receive on Wednesday, July 5, 2023
Article accepted on Wednesday, August 30, 2023