Rongchuan YueI; Zaiyong ZhengII; Zhan LvI; Jie FengI; Houxiang HuI
DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0260
CAAs = Coronary artery anomalies
CTA = Computed tomography angiography
CCTA = Coronary computed tomography angiography
ECG = Electrocardiogram
ESC = European Society of Cardiology
IVUS = Intravascular ultrasound
LAD = Left anterior descending
MPI = Myocardial perfusion imaging
MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging
PCI = Percutaneous coronary intervention
INTRODUCTION
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Given that coronary blood flow can show significant changes prior to cardiac dysfunction and/or structural disorders, it is crucial to evaluate coronary patency using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary angiography via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). With the widely application of PCI and CCTA, more and more artery anomalies have been reported. Herein, we present a previously undescribed coronary artery anomaly in which the left anterior descending (LAD) branch is divided into many small arteries, resembling a ponytail. This unique 'ponytail' coronary anomaly may pose challenges for radiological interpretation and clinical examination. We report the case of a 64-year-old female with severe stenosis (>75%) at the proximal region of the anterior descending branch revealed by CCTA. In addition, coronary angiography revealed that the anterior descending branch was divided into numerous small arteries.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 64-year-old female was admitted to our hospital wih an ischial tuberosity cyst. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) revealed T-wave inversion in V3-5 (Figure S1). CCTA was subsequently performed, which indicated proximal stenosis (>75%) of the anterior descending branch (Figure 1).
Physical examination and laboratory screening results were normal, and echocardiography revealed no abnormalities. The patient was transferred to the cardiology ward for coronary angiography, which revealed that the anterior descending branch was divided into many small arteries like a ponytail (Figure 2 and videos 1 to 5). The left circumflex and right coronary arteries were normal. The anomaly appeared benign, and the patient was able to undergo cystectomy. After 12 weeks of follow-up, the patient remained healthy without any symptoms.
DISCUSSION
Coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) are rare, with a prevalence of 0.64-1.3% in coronary angiographies. With the advent of CCTA, more CAAs have been detected, with incidence rates ranging between 0.7% and 18.4%. To distinguish non-pathogenic variants from potentially disease-causing variants, Angelini et al.[1] proposed defining the “normal” coronary artery as those present in >1% of an unselected general population, which contains normal coronary arteries and normal anatomical variants[2].
Dual left anterior descending (LAD) is one of the most common anomaies in LAD, although current diagnosis and classification strategies limit the number of LAD branches[3]. Unlike duplicated LAD, in this patient, the anterior descending branch was divided into a large number (≥3) of small arteries (Figure 3), all originating from the left main stem, like a "ponytail”. This abnormality has never been documented before and does not fit within the traditional classification system.
Most CAAs are incidentally detected during radiographic examinations and may partly resemble thrombotic recanalization on angiographic examination[4] or develop after severe stenosis[5,6]. However, the patient did not report prior history of myocardial infarction, and echocardiography did not reveal any structural or functional abnormalies. Furthermore, the position and direction of the blood vessel suggested anatomical variation rather than thrombotic recanalization.
CAAs are the second most common cause of sudden cardiac death in young athletes[2]. In the present case, the small branches provided adequate hemodynamic support in the patient’s daily life. However, ponytail LAD can be fatal in the setting of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, such abnormalities may lead to erroneous clinical diagnoses. In our case, the anterior descending branch was divided into many small branches, and CCTA revealed severe stenosis at the proximal region of the anterior descending branch.
With several CAAs, the risks and benefits of therapy, especially surgery, should be considered carefully[7]. Although non-invasive imaging can detect multiple CAAs, not every anomaly affects patient outcomes, and inappropriate treatment procedures may have adverse effects[8]. Additionally, multiple imaging methods, such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), should be used for more detailed diagnoses. IVUS can provide accurate information about the anomalous vascular structure, distinguishing coronary anomalies from thrombus recanalization. Unfortunately, our patient refused to participate in further investigation.
REFERENCES
1. Angelini P. Coronary artery anomalies--current clinical issues: definitions, classification, incidence, clinical relevance, and treatment guidelines. Tex Heart Inst J. 2002;29(4):271-8. [MedLine]
2. Villa AD, Sammut E, Nair A, Rajani R, Bonamini R, Chiribiri A. Coronary artery anomalies overview: the normal and the abnormal. World J Radiol. 2016;8(6):537-55. doi:10.4329/wjr.v8.i6.537. [MedLine]
3. Shriki JE, Shinbane JS, Rashid MA, Hindoyan A, Withey JG, DeFrance A, et al. Identifying, characterizing, and classifying congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries. Radiographics. 2012;32(2):453-68. doi:10.1148/rg.322115097. [MedLine]
4. Wen W, Liu H, Li J, Zhang Q. Woven-like change following intracoronary thrombosis recanalization: a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19(1):317. doi:10.1186/s12872-019-01283-5.
5. Hansen JF. Coronary collateral circulation: clinical significance and influence on survival in patients with coronary artery occlusion. Am Heart J. 1989;117(2):290-5. doi:10.1016/0002-8703(89)90771-0. [MedLine]
6. Koerselman J, van der Graaf Y, de Jaegere PP, Grobbee DE. Coronary collaterals: an important and underexposed aspect of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2003;107(19):2507-11. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000065118.99409.5F. [MedLine]
7. Cheitlin MD, MacGregor J. Congenital anomalies of coronary arteries: role in the pathogenesis of sudden cardiac death. Herz. 2009;34(4):268-79. doi:10.1007/s00059-009-3239-0. [MedLine]
8. Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Malagò R, Alberghina F, Meijboom WB, Pugliese F, et al. Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(4):781-91. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0821-9. [MedLine]
Authors’Roles & Responsibilities
RY = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published
ZZ = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published
ZL = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published
JF = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published
HH = Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published
Article receive on Sunday, July 9, 2023
Article accepted on Thursday, August 31, 2023