Article

lock Open Access lock Peer-Reviewed

0

Views

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Chemical demineralization of the aortic valve: a potential application and preliminary clinical experience

Ricardo Carvalho LimaI; Gerhard WIMMER-GREINECKERII; Mário Gesteira CostaIII; Mozart Augusto Soares de EscobarIV; Roberto DINIZV; Antônio CÉSIOV; Frederico VasconcelosVI; Alexandre Motta de MenezesVI; Robert POSERVII; Jerry RIEBMANVIII

DOI: 10.1590/S0102-76382006000200013

INTRODUCTION

In the United States of America approximately 1.2 millions of over 54-years-olds have some degree of aortic stenosis (AoS). Around 23% of these individuals are diagnosed as having differing degrees of aortic valve degeneration and dysfunction. Symptomatic AoS is associated with angina, dizziness and dyspnea. The current forms of treatment consist of valve replacement using a prosthesis, valve repair, balloon valvuloplasty and more recently transcutaneous replacement [1-3].

Attempts of AoS correction preserving the valve utilizing ultrasound and other surgical ablation techniques, present problems with the long-term clinical results including mechanical trauma of the surrounding tissues resulting in fibrosis, restenosis and perforation of the cusps [4,5].

The present treatment aims at chemical demineralization of the aortic valve, enabling in situ correction of the native valve as an alternative to the current clinical practice of its replacement using a prosthesis.

METHOD

Five patients suffering from mild to moderate AoS associated with coronary insufficiency were submitted to surgeries. The ages ranged from 65 to 81 years old with a mean of 73 years old. All the patients were men. Four patients presented with coronary artery disease of four vessels and one patient with involvement of a single vessel. The gradient through the aortic valve varied from 13 to 49 mmHg with a mean of 25 mmHg. The mean area of the aortic valve orifice was 1.1 cm2, ranging from 0.8 to 1.3 cm2. The following comorbidities were present: hypertension in four patients, hypercholesterolemia in four, diabetes mellitus in two and two were smokers. The time of cardiopulmonary bypass was 134 to 171 minutes with a mean of 152 minutes. The time of aortic clamping varied from 94 to 126 minutes with a mean of 107 minutes.

Surgical technique

Longitudinal median sternotomy was performed with dissection of the left internal thoracic artery and the saphenous vein. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established with an arterial cannula at the root of the aorta and simple cannulation of the right atrium. Hypothermia at 28 ºC, clamping of the aorta and infusion of isothermal sanguineous cardioplegia solution were utilized. Aortotomy was performed in the usual way for aortic valve replacement and access to the valve. Coronary ostium the lavage system Corazon Technologies, Inc - CA, USA with specific protectors was introduction (Figure 1).

After setting up the system, intermittent lavage of the aortic valve was initiated with saline solution at pH = 1. At the end of the 30 minutes session established by the protocol, the system was removed and coronary artery bypass grafting was initiated. The aorta was sutured in the normal manner, removing the air from the left chambers and clamping the ascending aorta and reanimating the heart. The project was approved by the Ethics Research Committee of the Oswaldo Cruz Teaching Hospital.

RESULTS

No deaths occurred whatsoever. The postoperative complications observed were total atrioventricular block in the first three patients. No events were seen that might compromise the integrity of the aortic valve or cause post-treatment aortic insufficiency. Moreover no neurological, systemic, metabolic or hematologic events were observed. The postoperative transvalvar gradient, determined by echocardiography demonstrated an improvement in the mean and systolic gradients (Table 1).


Fig. 1 - Catheter utilized during decalcification of the aortic valve with the heart arrested



DISCUSSION

Current recommendations do not include the treatment of valves during open surgery for AoS as patients are in the initial stages of the disease. However, aortic valve replacement with a prosthesis has been indicated in patients with moderate AoS, mainly in cases of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting [6-8]. Patients submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting in isolation and that, after a few years, were re-operated for aortic valve replacement due to AoS, frequently present with some evidence of calcification and valve dysfunction [9]. There is up to a sevenfold reduction in the mortality rate comparing patients with calcified AoS in the initial stages of the disease treated pro-actively during coronary artery bypass grafting and patients initially submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting and subsequently aortic valve replacement [7].

There are reports that there are changes in the mean gradient of AoS of 6.0 to 10.0 mmHg/year and that this progression quickens as the disease evolves [6,10]. In a study of 25 patients with calcified AoS, the evolution of the disease was faster when cardiac catheterism was used. Those with calcification presented with a mean increase in the gradient of 9.7 mmHg/year versus a rate of 4.4 mmHg/year in individuals without calcification giving a p-value < 0.02 [6]. The low death rates are associated with an early intervention impeding the evolution of the disease to a severe stage. Patients with calcified AoS have less favorable prognoses and only about 20% will survive more than four years after diagnosis [10]. It seems to be logical that survival can be increased for some patients if an efficacious treatment were available for early interventions.

This treatment of mild and moderate AoS in patients submitted to concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting enables an early intervention. The system was designed taking into account the fibrotic and calcified tissue that affects normal functioning of the valve. Over the short term, the expected result was confirmed with a reduction in the valve gradient and an increase in the cross-sectional area of the valve seen by echocardiography. We believe that the consolidation of this early technique enables, over the long term, substantial delay in the progression of the disease, removing minerals from the valve which are responsible for the need of aortic valve replacement.

In the current pilot study, there was no evidence of alterations in the integrity of the ventriculo-arterial junction, the appearance of or progression of a preexisting aortic insufficiency, appearance of cerebral injury or adverse effects to the hematologic, metabolic or hemodynamic systems. The first three patients presented with total atrioventricular blocks which were attributed to the type of balloon utilized on the internal face of the left ventricle. After starting to use a different design of balloon, the total atrioventricular blocks were not evidenced. This seems to demonstrate that not only the design of the balloon is important, but also the pressure and the length of time using the balloon in the left ventricle outflow tract during demineralization treatment of the aortic valve.

The next stages of this study will include a continuation of the evaluation of the demineralization technique, in order to try to better understand the acute and chronic impact on hemodynamic parameters of the aortic valve, to refine the inclusion and exclusion criteria of patients who might potentially benefit from this treatment and to expand the clinical research aiming at evaluating the endovascular utilization of this technique on the beating heart.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of the technique in this pilot study demonstrated it to be effective at improving the parameters analyzed by echocardiogram, in respect to the transvalvar gradient and valve area. The treatment did not cause any valvular injury or systemic alterations. The alterations observed in the conduction system were not related to the treatment itself, but to the lavage release system. The possibility of using the current treatment as an endovascular technique may allow a less invasive in situ treatment of the aortic valve.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors with to convey their special thanks to Shelby Young and Denise Gottifried for preparing the clinical protocol and giving support during the trial.

REFERENCES

1. Bahler RC, Desser DR, Finkelhor RS, Brener SJ, Youssefi M. Factors leading to progression of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84(9):1044-8.

2. King RM, Pluth JR, Giuliani ER, Piehler JM. Mechanical decalcification of the aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;42(3):269-72.

3. Otto CM, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach DD, Gown AM, O'Brien KD. Characterization of the early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic stenosis: histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation. 1994;90(2):844-53.

4. Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Schaff HV, Edwards WD. Aortic valve decalcification: history repeated with a new result. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49(5):689-90.

5. Humphries B, Triplett-McBride T, Newton RU, Marshall S, Bronks R, McBride J et al. The relation between dynamic, isokinetic and isometric strength and bone mineral density in a population of 45 to 65 year old women. J Sci Med Sport. 1999;2(4):364-74.

6. Davis SW, Gershlick AH, Balcon R. Progression of valvar aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study. Eur Heart J. 1991;12(1):10-4.

7. Hilton TC. Aortic valve replacement for patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Clin Cardiol. 2000;23(3):141-7.

8. Carabello BA. Progress in mitral and aortic regurgitation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2001;43(6):457-75.

9. Eitz T, Kleikamp G, Minami K, Gleichmann U, Korfer R. Aortic valve surgery following previous coronary artery bypass grafting: impact of calcification and leaflet movement. Int J Cardiol. 1998;64(2):125-30.

10. Horstkotte D, Piper C, Wiemer M, Schultheiss HP. Diagnostic approach and optimal treatment of aortic valve stenosis. Herz. 1998;23(7):434-40.

Article receive on Sunday, January 1, 2006

CCBY All scientific articles published at www.bjcvs.org are licensed under a Creative Commons license

Indexes

All rights reserved 2017 / © 2024 Brazilian Society of Cardiovascular Surgery DEVELOPMENT BY